<!--This file created 01.4.24 2:24 PM by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>tanaka28e</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=42 BOTTOM=613 LEFT=4 RIGHT=534></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2" COLOR="#0000AF">Japanese Education andThe Ministry of Education</FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT>BY HITOMI TANAKA</P><P>The five-day week system is going to take effect from April, 2002.School hours will decrease by two credits a week and the schoolsubjects will be cut by 30% of their current status. The aim of thisis to cultivate children's budding human nature through leisure timeand to foster the individual's whole ability to live. Also, a newclass named "general class of learning " has been established by theMinistry of Education. Children can experience nature, volunteeractivities and communicate with elderly people in that class. TheMinistry of Education published that it aims to foster children'sinnate human nature and social skills.</P><P>In old Japan it was natural that children lived with their parentsand their grand parents. However, nuclear families are increasingnow, so children can't communicate with elderly people. However,children can learn about the past through communicating with elderlypeople naturally. This is good for children. Also, it is good thatchildren will be interested in volunteerism from a young age .However, there is a problem. If children communicate with elderlypeople and do other volunteer activities in this class, it could be achore for them. Some people think that it can destroy the realmeaning of volunteer work. We should think poorly of the Japaneseculture's spirit by implying this style of volunteerism in the class.</P><P>Now, the Ministry of Education aims to give more leisure time tochildren by this five-day week system. But will children have realleisure? When I was a 5th grader in elementary school, we hadholidays twice a month, the second and fourth Saturday, so I spentthat time for my club activity, and I think other people spent thattime for their hobbys. Also, there were people who went to cramschool to study for the entrance examination. This is a problem,because our generation had a hectic lifestyle. So if the five-dayweek system is implemented, what will happen to the children? Thenumber of Classes will decrease, but high school and universitiesentrance exam's level will not be lowered. If they will not lower it,children will have to go to cram school to study for the entranceexam. This five-day week system aims to give leisure time forchildren, but there is likelihood that while increasing the time awayfrom school it may also children who don't have leisure in theirhearts.</P><P>The five-day week system is going to start as a new class called"general class of learning. " This class aims to develop children'seagerness for studying, but it will take away from the othersubjects. For example, the changing " Pi " in arithmetic from 3.14 to"about 3" and dropping subjects like " comfort women " in socialstudies.</P><P>I don't understand why the Ministry of Education wants to teach "Pi " as "about 3 " instead of the clear number 3.14 just so childrenwill get more holidays.</P><P>Also, we used to learn about World War II a little throughtextbooks at school. This was a dark chapter in Japan's past, butthere are no such stories in the new textbooks. Therefore, they won'thave knowledge about World War II. Let's examine that one of theproblems about World War II, the problem of "comfort women."</P><P>I did research about "comfort women " to write this article. Ididn't really know anything about comfort women before this. Therewere comfort women who were Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Taiwanese,women who lived in Asian Islands and Dutch women who lived inIndochina. So many races are concerned with comfort women. Peoplehave known about comfort women in the world but the Ministry ofEducation won't teach the Japanese children about comfort women atschool in Japan. Why won't the Ministry of Education do this? Thereare many reductions on sentences about acts of violence the Japanesearmy committed in history textbooks which will be printed in 2002.There used to be the term " Juugunianhu" ( comfort women in slaved bythe old Japanese army ) in those textbooks, but they changed thisinto " Ianhu " ( comfort women). These textbooks are increasing. Anold textbook had the sentence " Many Korean women were sent to thebattlefields as comfort women," but it was changed into " Many Koreanwomen were sent to the battlefields. " This sentence has lost itstrue meaning. Children use these textbooks so the changed contentsare easy to understand, but the Ministry of Education should teachabout comfort women. There has been recent problems of comfort womenwhile World War II ended 55 years, a more important story for ourchildren.</P><P>The Ministry of Education should teach what happened in World WarII in Japan to our children. If they don't do that, children willgrow up to be adults without the chance to study about Japanesehistory. What type of country would we be if we ignored our own past?</P><P>The children's parents and the PTA along with those who run ourschools should not only think about what we want to teach ourchildren, but also we have to teach our children. The Ministry ofEducation does not have to push the contents of textbooks into thechildren. They must listen and try to carry out parents's and thePTA's voices. The Ministry of Education's duties are to educatechildren who grow up to be Japanese without disgrace and children whoare accepted all over the world in the 21st century. Of course, thisis our duty as well.</P><P><CENTER><HR><A HREF="../28japanese/tanaka28j.html">Japanese</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="28topics">topics</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="../index.html">index</A></CENTER></P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P><P>　</P></BODY></HTML>