<!--This file created 01.4.24 2:18 PM by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>kaneko28e</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=42 BOTTOM=613 LEFT=4 RIGHT=534></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2" COLOR="#00AF00">The Actual Situation ofWhaling </FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT>BY JUNKO KANEKO</P><P>About 1000 years has passed since people began whale hunting alongthe European coasts in the nine to ten centuries. There are variousregulations in the present whaling societies to reflect on the pastover-hunting. It is still prohibited to catch humpback whales, bluewhales, fin whales, and sei whales which live in the Antarctic Oceanbecause large-size whales were captured intensively and the number ofthese species has decreased rapidly. In 1984 the IWC (InternationalWhaling Commission) was established. The purposes of the commissionare preservation, control, valid use of whale stocks and the orderlydevelopment of the whaling industry. The IWC has 39 member nations atpresent. A few member nations such as Japan and Norway insist onresuming whaling; Iceland was one of the nations which had beenwhaling since ancient times, and also desired to resume whaling.After its 1992 secession from the IWC, however, Iceland has notresumed whaling. China, Korea, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and theGrenadines, Dominica, etc. are neutral nations. About 30 other membernations are anti-whaling. There is a growing sentiment that whalingshould be banned all over the world since the resolution of amoratorium on commercial whaling was adapted by the IWC in 1982.However, Japan, along with several countries and districts, stillcatch whales for several reasons, as follows.</P><P>There are four kinds of whaling at present. One of them isaboriginal subsistence whaling. People who live in five districts inAmerica, Russia, etc. are allowed to continue whaling to preservetheir living. They capture under 200 whales a year on average. Thesecond is commercial whaling by Norway. Norway carries out commercialwhaling with the permission of the IWC, so they capture 500 to 600minke whales in the North Atlantic Ocean each year. The third iswhaling by nations which are not members of IWC. Some inhabitants wholive in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Canada capture about 500whales a year.</P><P>The last one is research whaling by Japan. The InternationalWhaling Control Regulation, which created the IWC in 1948, wasestablished and signed in 1946. Its eighth provision says "Tocapture, kill, and dispose of whales for scientific research isallowed." Therefore, Japan continues whaling according to theprovision. According to the data of Fisheries Agency of Japan, Japanbegan whaling research with the approval of IWC in 1987. In 2000Japan conducted four expeditions; whale capture research in theNorthwest Pacific Ocean, none-capture research around the Boninislands, whale capture research in the southern Pacific Ocean, andwhale capture research in the Antarctic Ocean. The objects of theresearch were minke whales, Bryde's whales, sperm whales and bluewhales; the research resulted in the capture of about 500 whales in2000. This research is contributing to some elucidation of the numberof live minke whales, the ecology of blue whales, and the ecosystemsof individual sea areas and is a part of the ongoing studies of theIWC Scientific Committee.</P><P>On the other hand, Japan is denounced by anti-whaling countries,"Japanese research whaling is only nominal; they capture more thanthey need," and, "Japanese people are a barbarous race who have ahabit of eating whales, which are dear and highly intelligent. " Atthe 52nd IWC annual convention held in 2000, the Scientific Committeehighly evaluated Japanese research whaling, but after that, at thegeneral conference, anti-whaling nations submitted a resolution torequire Japan to stop whaling research. Japan severely denounced theresolution saying, "This resolution infringes upon the right which isgiven member nations to carry out whaling research stated in theeighth provision of the International Whaling Control Regulation.Besides, this resolution disregards the view of the ScientificCommittee." Nevertheless, enthusiasm against whaling is rising amonghostile non-governmental organizations such as Green Peace.</P><P>Japanese people have been living mainly by fishing from ancienttimes because Japan is surrounded by seas, and there were a lot ofseaside towns and villages which became enriched by whaling. Takingthis into account, whaling must be regarded as part of Japaneseculture. In fact, reckless whale hunting was caused by the fact thatJapan gradually changed the whaling system from its old style ofsmall-scale hunting into the modern style of large-scale hunting.Japan, at present, has also begun to cooperate about the preservationof whales. It is regrettable that a lot of people in the world regardJapanese research whaling as only nominal. I am not sure that thenumber of 500 is really necessary for research or not. However, if itis obviously necessary, Japan must report to and appeal to the peopleof the world of the importance of its research. Anyway, I sincerelyhope that whaling shall remain a part of Japanese culture in a waythat will allow the international community to consent to it.</P><P><CENTER><HR><A HREF="../28japanese/kaneko28j.html">Japanese</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="28topics">topics</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="../index.html">index</A></CENTER></P><P>@</P></BODY></HTML>