<!--This file created 02.7.25 1:41 PM by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>hase33e</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=66 BOTTOM=768 LEFT=8 RIGHT=538></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1" COLOR="#0000AF">Holland first tolegalize Mercy Killing</FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT>By Makoto Hase</P><P>One fact we human beings can not avoid is death. How one died isbecoming important. Is it right to keep patients alive as long aspossible when they are terminally ill\even if they dont wanttreatment? And what about the families? Do they have a right to stopor extend treatment? These are difficult questions.</P><P>On April 1, 2002, Mercy Killing (also called euthanasia) waslegalized in Holland for the first time anywhere in the world. Untilnow, Mercy Killing was only allowed by state law in California andOregon, U.S, but this case in Holland is the first time to legalizeit at the national level. Of course, this subject comes up not onlyin Japan but throughout the world. The main requirements for allowingeuthanasia are as follows; 1) the patient wants to die because, 2)the patient can no longer withstand the pain, and, 3) the doctors whoperform euthanasia must consult with other doctors. Also, the largestpro-euthanasia organization in the world, The Dutch VoluntaryEuthanasia Society (NVVE), carries on with its movement so thateuthanasia will be granted to not only these with physical distressbut also these with mental distress.</P><P>In Holland, the controversy about euthanasia recurred from theearly 1970s, so euthanasia has been accepted through the guidelinesof the medical profession or legal judgements. Moreover, the BurialLaw, which was revised in 1994, is a standard for grantingeuthanasia. In following this law, over 4,000 cases of euthanasia arecarried out every year. Hollands neighboring country Belgium, whichhas been influenced by Holland, has begun the procedure towardlegality. In the case of Belgium, however, it seems they alreadyallow euthanasia like the Dutch. It is right to say that Belgiumbegan legal procedures for allowing euthanasia because of theinfluence of Holland.</P><P>Why did the Mercy Killing Bill reach the national level inHolland? I think it relates to Hollands heritage of individualityand freedom. They dont want to be interfered with by others, andthey are tolerant as long as others dont cause trouble. The MercyKilling Bill could be reached in this social climate.</P><P>Euthanasia relates directly to medical aspects, and is connectedto religious issues. In Holland about 20 percent are Catholic, about16 percent are Protestant and about 60 percent are agnostic (1997).In the 1950s, many people belonged to the Catholic or Protestantchurch. But since then there have been many social changes with lessfocus on religion. Respect for individuality and freedom increasedalong with the number of agnostic people in Holland. This must be onebig reason the first Mercy Killing Bill was introduced.</P><P>In Japan, various discussions arose after the introduction of thisbill. However, the movement toward the approval by society continuesabout death with dignity. Most Japanese dont see life extension asrelated to the issue of mercy killing. There is an indication inJapan, that as the treatments for relieving pain improve, many peoplewould rather have death with dignity than do mercy killing. Weneed facilities like hospices or home terminal care because manyterminal patients refuse life extension treatments and meet deathwith dignity. Most people have a misunderstanding about hospicesbecause hospice is not yet a familiar word in Japan. Essentially,however, hospices are places where patients come to the end of theirlives in their own way. I can agree that we have to create morefacilities like hospices so that people can have an understanding ofwhat a hospice is.</P><P>Eventually, patients who hope to carry out euthanasia should lettheir families know of their resolution. A simple reason for carryingout euthanasia should not be permitted and we need variousrequirements as they do in Holland. On the other hand, the moreeuthanasia increases, the less we may hesitate to choose death as ourresistance to this idea decreases. Should we promote death?</P><P>We can learn many important things from Holland where they discussabout facing death through public and political forums. I can notimagine euthanasia as it is in Holland, but it will become a bigproblem which will take a long time to discuss and contemplate on thebasis of Japanese culture, history and religion. @</P><P><CENTER><HR><A HREF="../33japanese/hase33j.html">Japanese</A><BR><A HREF="33topics.html">Topics</A><BR><A HREF="../index.html">Index</A></CENTER></P><P>@</P></BODY></HTML>