<!--This file created 02.7.25 1:27 PM by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>okuhara33e</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=66 BOTTOM=768 LEFT=8 RIGHT=538></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+1" COLOR="#AF0000">Something is rotten inthe Ministry of Foreign Affairs</FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE="+1">By Izumi Okuhara</FONT></P><P>The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is a window into Japanesediplomacy. Recently, scandals of officials have been disclosed, andthe problems are being debated all over the world. The officers whoshoulder the general diplomacy in Japan and are dispatched asspecialists, seem to forget their role. Many Japanese are worriedthat they donÕt understand their responsibility.</P><P>One example is the situation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs asevident in the Consulate General Affair in Shen yang, China.Koreshige Anami, who is the Japanese ambassador to China, instructedofficials to eject unidentified foreigners from the embassy.Therefore, officials stood and watched as Chinese police officersremoved the Democratic PeopleÕs Republic of Korea exiles. Inaddition, they returned a letter from Chinese officials asking forpermission to take the exiles because they couldnÕt understand it, asit was written in English. A video captured one official picking up aChinese police officerÕs hat when the incident happened. Why did theofficer just stand and do nothing? In addition, it is incredible thatthe official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs canÕt understandEnglish. That the officials used this excuse to justify their conductis unacceptable.</P><P>The Ambassador has been criticized by the government andopposition parties for this incident. Even if some of the officialstook responsibility, there will be no change unless the nature of theMinistry of Foreign Affairs is improved. Fundamental reform isnecessary, since the whole the Ministry of Foreign Affair has gonebad. This event resulted in the disclosure of a dualism of diplomacy.That is to say, what they say is different from what they do.</P><P>The claims of China and Japan about this incident were different.Japan claimed that@Chinese police officers came in the ConsulateGeneral without permission, which is a violation of the GenevaConvention. On the other hand, China pointed out the fact that theJapanese official returned the letter without reading it. Japaneseofficials denied the matter at first, but later they admitted it.This shows the nature of the officials who try to hide troublesomethings. The family was eventually sent to the Republic of Korea, butthis problem is still unresolved politically. More attention has tobe paid to the facts of this incident and how to cope better withproblems.</P><P>Japan has been criticized all over the world for this incident.Amnesty International, which is an association for the protection ofhuman rights, said, ŅWe should a question how Japan has coped withthis incident,Ó and ŅJapanese and Chinese make light of refugees wholook for protection.Ó In addition, they commented that "This incidentdemonstrated the problem among the three nations, Japan, China, andthe Democratic PeopleÕs Republic of Korea." It is necessary toresolve the incident quickly and reform the Japanese Ministry ofForeign Affairs. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs official mustnÕt letthis happen again.</P><P>During World War II, there was a diplomat in the Ministry ofForeign Affairs stationed in Lithuania named Chiune Sugihara. Heissued visas for 6,000 Jews who wanted to escape from the Nazis bygoing to America or Israel via Japan. The Japanese government deniedMr. Sugihara's request three times. He decided to help the Jewsanyway when he received an order to return to Japan. On his way outof Lithuania, he continued to write visas without sleep until hecould no longer hold a pen. He knew that he would lose his jobbecause he didnÕt obey the government's orders. He saved the lives of6,000 Jews instead of his status. He is a true diplomat, and isdifferent from present diplomats. Are there diplomats who act forhuman rights like him now? Diplomats who only defend themselvesarenÕt needed. A proper diplomat must become a guidepost of Japanesediplomacy, and act quickly when a problem occurs. However, presentdiplomats are conservative, and donÕt think about the nation andJapanese diplomacy. Such officials shouldnÕt become diplomats. It ishoped that diplomats who can act with responsibility will increase inJapan.</P><P><CENTER><HR><A HREF="../33japanese/okuhara33j.html">Japanese</A><BR><A HREF="33topics.html">Topics</A><BR><A HREF="../index.html">Index</A><BR></CENTER></P><P>@</P><P>@</P></BODY></HTML>