<!--This file created 06.9.14 11:55 AM by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>matsuzaka45e</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=43 BOTTOM=758 LEFT=4 RIGHT=534></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2">The Realignment of U.S. forces inJapan</FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT><FONT SIZE="+1">By Miho Matsuzaka</FONT></P><P>@</P><P>On May 1, Japanese and U.S. ministers in charge of foreign affairsand defense agreed on the realignment of the U.S. forces in Japan ina Security Consultative Committee meeting which finalized thethree-year negotiations between the two countries.</P><P>This reorganization is based on not only transferring andrealigning U.S. forces, but also on the fundamental modifications ofmilitary strategy. Following the simultaneous terrorist attacks ofSeptember 11, 2001, the U.S. is reconsidering the present militaryorganization on a global scale in order to make the U.S. forces moremobile and one can deploy forces anywhere in the world quickly, andrealign them accordingly.</P><P>Two big issues emerged, in the negotiations: the cost oftransferring and personnel, and the military integration of Japaneseand U.S. forces. In the first one, according to the final report,Japan will shoulder 59 percent the relocation costs of the airport atFutenma base and the costs of transferring the Marines in Okinawa toGuam, including the cost of the carrier-based aircraft unitrelocation from Atsugi to Iwakuni.</P><P>This is being carried out in order to reduce the burden onOkinawa. However, from a military point view, this is a change in theorganization by the U.S. government for U.S. forces. Iwakuni citizensare strongly opposed to this relocation and worry about this newburden.</P><P>The expenses Japan must pay is one of the biggest problems. It wasdecided that Japan bear $6.07 billion (about 70 million) out of the$10.27 billion of the Guam relocation costs (about 700 billion).Surprisingly, U.S. Vice-Defense Secretary Lawrence announced theprojected total expense of the U.S. forces realignment will reach $26billon (about 2.99 trillion) if the costs of the Guam relocationand the realignment of U.S. forces in Japan are added together.However, he did not mention the Japan's total expenses. Hisannouncement was unclear, but there will be debate about this amongthe government party and the opposition parties in the Diet.</P><P>Payments for these changes will begin in 2007. Although PrimeMinister Koizumi admitted the difficulty in gaining the nation'sunderstanding about the heavy financial burden which he leaves to thenew Prime Minister who will take over the regime in September, 2006.</P><P>The other big issue is the military integration of Japanese andU.S. forces. This military integration is the final report's keywordfor the reorganization of U.S. forces in Japan, which is acceleratedby the headquarters functional integration of Japanese Self DefenseForces and U.S. forces. The two countries enhancement of thealliances' capability is being carried out in phases such as sharingmilitary information and joint training. The intention of the Japanand U.S. alliance is to maintain a deterrent power against anyEastern Asian threats.</P><P>On the other hand, Okinawa's burden will be reduced to some extentby transferring the Marines. However, its importance as a strategicstronghold has not changed. Moreover, the implementation of thisJapan-U.S. realignment plan is revealed in the road map in detailwhich revealed such things as missile defense, Japan-U.S. wide-rangejoint training and military exercises with the Marines.</P><P>According to the final report, this re-alignment will take a longtime. Also, any Post-Koizumi government, must build a newrelationship based on the new Japan-U.S. alliance and also bear theresponsibility for carrying it out. Although the Japanese governmentdecided to pay a great amount of expenses for the relocation of U.S.forces in Japan, they must explain about it in the Diet. Japan has topay this expense using citizens' taxes for many years to come. Ifcitizens feel anger about this government's decision, they shouldexpress that to the government. On one hand, it seems as if Japan isa branch of the U.S. army, and on the other hand it seems Japan isemploying the army by paying the cost. Prime Minister Koizumi shouldexplain about the situation honestly. The government ought to adopt apolicy in which they can gain nationีs agreement.</P><P><CENTER>@<HR><A HREF="../45japanese/matsuzaka45j.html">Japanese<BR></A><A HREF="topics45">Topics<BR></A><A HREF="../index.html">Index</A></CENTER></P></BODY></HTML>