<!--This file created 99.8.6 15:36 by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>agatsu-e-23</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=42 BOTTOM=757 LEFT=4 RIGHT=534></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2" COLOR="#AF0000">Higher Court Decisionon the Northern Territories</FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT>BY AGATSU KIMURA</P><P>The late Masugata Kiichro, who used to live and possess lands inthe Northern Territories (NT) , requested a transfer of the owner'saddress in the registry book. The Government, however, refused. OnMarch 25th, 1997, the Kushiro district court delivered a decisionwhich found the refusal illegal. But on January 26th, 1999, theSapporo High Court repealed the decision and handed down a judgmentwhich admitted the government's claim.</P><P>The judge gave the following three reasons: (1) We can not regardthe registry book as exact because no one has surveyed the land; (2)The Law concerning the Registration of Immovable properties is notintended to include the NT. Registering land in the NT might preventsafe and smooth transfer, which is the purpose of the law; (3) Theimmovable properties in the NT are not within the Japanese state andJapanese law cannot be applied. Thereby these are not immovableproperties which can be registered.</P><P>It seems that even in the administration of justice the Governmentneglects protecting the rights of the former islanders, and we canunderstand their anger. Though the Government has insisted the NT areJapanese territory, it has never shown any clear policy to protectthe former islanders' property rights. If these rights are notupheld, when the islands come back in the future how will it handlethese matters? It should improve the law. But this judgment concealsthe Government's fault.</P><P>The Government's attitude toward the NT is full ofinconsistencies. (1) It allows people to register the lands when theyinherit them, but does not allow them to transfer the owner's addressinto the registration book. (2)Though the district legal affairsbureau permits the transfer of the permanent domicile to the NT,regarding them as Japanese, the Ministry of Finance imposes tariffson the imports from the NT. (3)While the Government appealed theKushiro district court's decision and discourages people fromcampaigning for the NT reversion, it declared support for campaignsrequesting the NT reversion at a mass meeting in which Prime MinisterObuchi, Foreign Minister Komura and others took part in on February7th at the NT Day in Tokyo.</P><P>The Government has to show Russia that Japan's laws apply to theNT in order to claim the NT belong to Japan. This is politics. Theworld laughs at Japan because the Government ignores the formerislander's rights while it insists the NT should be Japanese. Doesthe Government respect the wishes of the 600 citizens whoparticipated in the neighborhood meeting for the NT reversion inNemuro? We should think of this as an issue of our own.</P><P><CENTER><HR><A HREF="../23japanese/agatsu-j-23.html">Japanese</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="23topics.html">Topics</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="../index.html">Index</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER>@</CENTER></P></BODY></HTML>