<!--This file created 00.7.8 3:37 PM by Claris Home Page version 2.0J--><HTML><HEAD>   <TITLE>kimura26e1</TITLE>   <META NAME=GENERATOR CONTENT="Claris Home Page 2.0J">   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;CHARSET=x-sjis">   <X-SAS-WINDOW TOP=42 BOTTOM=613 LEFT=4 RIGHT=534></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2" COLOR="#AF0000">Attitude We Should Taketoward Teacher Evaluations</FONT></B></CENTER></P><P ALIGN=RIGHT>BY AGATSU KIMURA</P><P>Teacher evaluations by students have started in this academic yearin all classes in the Faculty of Foreign Languages. Our universitytook a long time to adopt this system, which produces arguments bothpro and con. What kind of attitude toward the evaluation systemshould we have in order for it to benefit us?</P><P>This is part of the university reformation, and is designed toimprove our classes. The evaluation of universities has been decidedmainly by the students' deviations of the entrance examination, whichentrance exam industries produce. But from now it will also includeboth students' and teachers' achievements. Those industries willconsider teachers' qualities, students' effort, graduates'accomplishments and such accordingly. This is a trial in adjusting tothe change of the times.</P><P>One good point of this system is that we can put more pressure onteachers. Some teachers will have to modify classes where they onlyread their own notes intently, ignoring students. The less boringclasses students have, the more they will participate in the classes.It will be more interesting and students will be satisfied with themas a result. On the other hand, students will have to study morepositively. When you get a right, you have to meet an obligation.</P><P>We should be aware, however, of the fact that this system does notpromise to make classes easier for students. This is a means forteachers to consider their own classes. Only a teacher can get hisown class questionnaire data. The purpose of the questionnaire is toelicit opinions from students. We cannot use this system beneficiallyif we do not understand its purpose. It is meaningless to call ateacher "bad" because he or she does not give credit, because he orshe assigns much homework, or because he or she gives classesthroughout the full class time. This system does not allowed us tohave an expectation that we can get credits easily. It is especiallymeaningless for diligent students to have classes in which the levelsare aimed at lazy students.</P><P>By answering this questionnaire students can think over their ownattitudes toward classes of this past year. This is a good chance toconsider not only attendance, papers, and preparation and review, butalso to think about how this can broaden into other fields of study.</P><P>Using teacher evaluations, students can influence classes in apositive way which will benefit all students. When both teachers andstudents make efforts to improve present faults, ideal classes willappear. And it needs a premise that students have high diligence.Students' sincere answers will affect not only SU's present, but itsfuture too.</P><P><CENTER><HR><A HREF="../26japanese/kimura26j.html">Japanese</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="26topics.html">Topics</A></CENTER></P><P><CENTER><A HREF="../index.html">Index</A></CENTER></P></BODY></HTML>